Saturday, September 12, 2009

Secret #10: Repeat After Me: "I Don't Know."



Congratulations! You did your homework, organized your thoughts, clarified your point of view and figured out what it was the group at the meeting needed to hear. You rehearsed out loud, took constructive criticism and made adjustments. You practiced relaxing, increased your confidence and nailed your part of that important meeting! At the very end, as you triumphantly sipped your water, the Senior VP of Marketing asked you that one-in-a-million question you were not prepared to field. When you regained consciousness and were removed from the conference room floor, you wondered,

You: What happened?

Me: Well, as far as I can tell, you let an unexpected question completely throw you. It threw you on the floor, actually.

You: I should have known that answer! How could I have been so stupid?

Me: It isn’t a question of ‘stupid.’ You were well prepared. You can’t know the answer to everything. What you just experienced was a very important lesson!

You: What I just experienced was a swan dive into industrial carpeting. I still have the pattern on my forehead!

Me: There is an old Russian proverb that goes like this, ‘There is no shame in not knowing; the shame lies in not finding out.’

You: Where I come from we have a saying, too. (makes hostile gesture)

Listen, I’m not advocating that anyone be unprepared. Spending time learning the material and developing a solid understanding of the topic is a basic and essential part of speaking with authority and confidence. What I am saying is that it is unrealistic to believe that we can know everything. I know a guy who acts like he does, and I tell you, he’s a terrible bore. Actually, I’ve met many more than one person like this – you know the kind – the authority on everything. I find that kind of unwavering certainty unconvincing mainly because it’s not possible. The truth is, you can’t know it all and no one expects you to. The people I admire most and who are considered the experts in their respective fields are, without exception, quick to say when they don’t know something. They have become well-respected as a result of their curiosity and their understanding that there is always more worth knowing.

It’s sort of like the menus at diners.

You: Uh-Oh…

Me: Bear with me.

A typical diner menu has about seven laminated pages of items – pasta, chops, “fresh” fish, burritos, burgers, buffalo wings, matzo ball soup, waffles, Chinese chicken salad, spinach pie, beef stroganoff, chicken Florentine – you get the idea. All I can think when I look at those menus is, they can’t possibly be good at all of this. I’ll play it safe and get the tuna melt. A fine restaurant, however, offers a one-page menu with only a few selections that represent the items the restaurant considers specialties. Know-it-all people are a lot like diner menus. They know a little about a lot of things, but rarely know any of them well. You may get the beef and the noodles, but you’ll swear it ain’t no stroganoff. I’ll stick with the tuna melt, thank you.

Worse than panicking and stammering is trying to fake it. I can never think about this without reliving the horror of the Miss South Carolina moment from 2007 that will stand for all time as the worst-case scenario in this realm. I don’t expect any of us would come out with a sentence like, “I believe that our education, like, such as the Africa and the Iraq, everywhere like such as, and I believe that they should, our education over here in the U.S. should help the U.S. …” It, of course, goes on but I can't.

OK, shake that off. There is a graceful way to deal with questions to which we don’t have the answers. There is a way to respond that keeps your integrity intact and doesn’t unravel everything that came before the unwelcome question. (Who will remember anything else about that unfortunate young woman?) When you really do not know the answer, you need to say so. Why not be generous, and commend the asker for the quality of the question? If necessary, ask that person to clarify what they’re asking. At that point, you crafty devil, the attention goes away from you and turns to the questioner, where it belongs. Then you make a plan to resolve it. Let them know you are intrigued by the question, and that you’ll look into it and get back to them quickly (and be sure you do). After this, you can ask if there are any more questions and jump right back on track. Now, doesn’t that sound better than to trying to make something up? People can generally tell when you’re faking it and that can destroy the credibility of all you said before (making you look more like a diner menu than the plat du jour).

Besides, no matter how carefully you attempt to prepare for all possible questions, there will be that one that just never made it on the radar. Though I’m not superstitious, I make an exception for the laws of that troublemaker Murphy. If you prepared for everything but that one, little piece, chances are someone will ask you about it. It’s best not to kick yourself in these situations. Instead, do your best to be prepared and expect that someone else may come up with something you haven’t thought of. You can actually plan for it and rehearse responses. You can look at it as evidence of the dynamic nature of spoken interaction and a great chance to expand the topic. You can even find it interesting.

By now, you’re probably noticing that these secrets are, in one way or another, about giving ourselves a break and quieting the interference that detracts from our chances at doing a job we can be proud of. A person who stays composed and shows interest in the question he or she is posed gets my vote of confidence.

I like what Voltaire says: “He must be very ignorant for he answers every question he is asked.”

2 comments:

  1. i agree with you stephanie. it is important to know when to say i don't know. recently, i had a job interview where saying 'i don't know' was imperative. however i rambled on and on about something i didn't know much about. as a result, my credibility fell thru the floor. saying 'i don't know only' can also throw you off. you should compliment it with something like 'but i have the tools to investigate the matter'

    thank you stephani. keep em' comin'

    stickman

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice blog. As a former litigation attorney turned freelance writer, I spent a great deal of time advising clients to make sure to say "I don't know" when asked questions to which they did not know the answers. A corollary of this imperative, also taken from the legal world, is to avoid trying to fill silences just because. Sometimes a pregnant pause is just the ticket and is far better than rambling. When does this occur? Generally when one is waiting for the next question (very dangerous in the deposition or trial context). Nice posts and like your logo as well!

    ReplyDelete